Glad to see a little reality is starting to creep back into the estimates. On the other hand, he was not so brave as to pick up on the theme presented in the second half of my paragraph: ![]() Still, this is in line with what I was pointing out a while back: The Ukrainian casualty claims are inflated – part 1 | Mystics & Statistics (). Lots of other people have published much higher figures. ![]() Still, it does look like the article was heavily influenced or even inspired by my post on 22 July in the section on casualties that started more than half-way down the 7,000+ word post:Ĭasualties: William Burns, the Director of the CIA, on 20 July and Mi-6 in the UK are both now putting Russian dead in this war at 15,000. ![]() The Dupuy Institute was name-checked in the article and the author gave us a shout out on twitter We do appreciate that. Sunday evening (probably Monday UK time) The Economist published an article called “How heavy are Russian casualties in Ukraine?” It is here (but not fully available if you do not have a subscription): How heavy are Russian casualties in Ukraine? | The Economist.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |